Perspective,

Volume IV, Issue 2, 69 - 72, 31 December 2024.

SABR vs. SBRT: A New Deal for Radiotherapy Beyond Terminology

Author(s) :

Angel Montero1,2, Helena BZ Logar3, Ivica Ratosa3

  1. Department of Radiation Oncology, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
  2. Faculty of Health, Universidad Camilo José Cela of Madrid, Spain
  3. Department of Radiotherapy, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.

Corresponding author: Angel Montero, Email: angel.monteroluis@gmail.com

Publication History: Received - 14 December 2024, Revised - 31 December 2024, Accepted - 31 December 2024, Published Online - 31 December 2024.

Copyright: © 2024 The author(s). Published by Casa Cărții de Știință.


User License: Creative Commons Attribution – NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)


DOI: 10.53011/JMRO.2024.02.09

586

Views

14

Downloads

0

Citations

×

Cite

Abstract

Employed shortly after its discovery over a century ago, radiotherapy has become the most effective cancer treatment after surgery. Its utility, however, extends beyond oncology, with proven success in managing non-malignant conditions as well. Over its 120-year history, the evolution of radiotherapy has been driven by two main pillars: radiobiological knowledge—explaining the “how,” “why,” and “when” of its application—and technological advancements, which enable and enhance these principles. Efforts to increase precision, amplify therapeutic effects, shorten treatment duration, and ultimately improve clinical outcomes and patient quality of life are central to translational research in radiation oncology. Stereotactic radiotherapy techniques represent the pinnacle of these ongoing advancements.

“Things are themselves and their circumstances. If I remove the circumstances, they cease to be.”

José Ortega y Gasset, Meditations on Quixote (1914)

Radiotherapy is the most effective treatment against cancer after surgery, contributing independently to the cure of approximately 40% of cancers (1). This effectiveness has been recognized almost since the discovery of X-rays, with their use reported just days after their discovery to treat a woman with breast cancer (2). The evolution of radiotherapy as a cancer treatment has been driven by three main pillars of both biological and technological advancement: increasing precision in its delivery, enhancing the administered dose and its biological efficacy, and reducing the total duration of treatment.

Although stereotactic radiotherapy has been known and used for a longer time, particularly in treating intracranial diseases, it was in 2010 that extracranial stereotactic radiotherapy gained formal recognition. This followed the publication of a seminal paper in the red journal, which defined the characteristics of this new approach to radiotherapy, later known as extracranial stereotactic radiotherapy. According to the authors, this is a form of external-beam radiotherapy (EBRT) based on high-precision systems for delivering high doses of radiation to extracranial targets in one or very few fractions, achieving steep dose gradients between the target and surrounding healthy tissues (3).

From that moment this modality of radiotherapy began to be known as SBRT (Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy) —by analogy with cranial stereotactic radiosurgery techniques— gaining increasing prominence and convincing more oncologists of its safety and efficacy. This advanced form of EBRT represents a step toward precision oncology, echoing the Olympic motto, “Citius, Altius, Fortius” — faster administration, higher precision in target definition, and stronger doses. This progress has been underpinned by critical advancements: the ability to precisely localize the target thanks to imaging innovations, the precision in dose deposition facilitated by volumetric-modulated arc therapy/ intensity- modulated radiation therapy (VMAT/IMRT) and emerging adaptive radiotherapy (ART) techniques, tools to control both patient and tumor motion to reduce geographic errors, and, importantly, the radiobiological rationale for delivering high doses in fewer fractions to mitigate the effects of tumor repopulation (4,5).

However, the significance of stereotactic radiotherapy extends beyond technological refinements and precision in delivery. What makes it a game-changer in oncology are its strengths in cancer treatment: its dual action on the tumor’s cellular component and its supportive microenvironment maximizes tumoricidal effects; its effectiveness in traditionally radioresistant hypoxic regions eliminates even the least sensitive cellular components; and its potential to convert a “cold” (immunoresistant) phenotype into a “hot” (immunosensitive) one synergizes with advanced immunotherapy (6). Currently, SBRT is a standard option for selected cases of lung, kidney, liver, pancreas, and prostate cancers, vertebral metastases, and the radical treatment of oligometastatic disease (7-14). Furthermore, ablative precision treatment is emerging as a key therapeutic option, with consolidation in existing standard indications and expansion into new ones such as breast cancer, head and neck tumors, gynecological malignancies, and advanced polymetastatic disease (15-18).  The synergistic potential of SBRT with advanced therapies, such as immunotherapy is fostering better outcomes (19). Finally, reducing radiotherapy to just 1-3 fractions is now a reality for many tumors, embodying the concept of “cure in a week” with significant social, economic, and personal benefits for patients.

This therapeutic leap transcends technological advancements and focuses on the most critical goal of any treatment: curing the disease. Thus, the term SBRT began to seem insufficient, failing to capture the essential purpose of ars medica — healing. This led to the proposal of the term SABR (Stereotactic Ablative Radiation Therapy), which integrates the concept of ablation, of tumor elimination, of disease eradication, and ultimately, of cure (20). From this point on, a vigorous but metaphorically bloodless debate ensued, with the champions of the SBRT and SABR definitions entrenched in their respective Houses as in a modern Game of Thrones defending their position against the others. While words are important, the inherent circumstances that give them meaning are even more so. To cure sometimes, to relieve often, to comfort always is a statement that all doctors know and should never forget. And beyond the intentions of SBRT advocates, it seems reasonable from a clinical standpoint that SABR offers a more comprehensive definition, encompassing the technological backbone of precision oncology while focusing on the raison d’être of medicine: curing patient.

In conclusion, advocating for the possibility of healing not only through actions but also through words is a desirable aspiration. SABR offers us both: the real option to heal, to cure, to eliminate tumors, and the possibility of expressing it in plain words. But far beyond the terminological debate, it is undeniable that these advanced irradiation techniques are already transforming radiotherapy’s role in cancer treatment. SABR is not the future of radiotherapy, nor merely the present; it represents the dawn of a new deal for cancer cure. This paradigm maximizes the biological power of irradiation, overcomes traditional barriers in radiotherapy (such as distance to treatment centers and treatment-related costs), shortens treatment duration, and streamlines workflows, ensuring timely care for all patients.

 

Abbreviations

ART – adaptive radiotherapy

EBRT – external-beam radiotherapy

IMRT – intensity-modulated radiation therapy

SABR – Stereotactic Ablative Radiation Therapy

SBRT – Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy

VMAT – volumetric-modulated arc therapy

 

Statements

Authors’ contributions: AM, HL and IR contributed equally to this article regarding preliminary idea, development, writing, editing and reviewing the manuscript.

Consent for publication: As the corresponding author, I confirm that the manuscript has been read and approved for submission by all named authors.

Conflict of interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest

Funding Sources: None

References

  1. Mee T, Kirkby NF, Defourny NN, Kirkby KJ, Burnet NG. The use of radiotherapy, surgery and chemotherapy in the curative treatment of cancer: results from the FORTY (Favourable Outcomes from Radio TherapY) project. Br J Radiol. 2023 Dec;96(1152):20230334. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20230334.
  2. Grubbé EH. Priority in the therapeutic use of X-rays. Radiology 1933; 21: 156–162.
  3. Potters L, Kavanagh B, Galvin JM, Hevezi JM, Janjan NA, Larson DA, Mehta MP, Ryu S, Steinberg M, Timmerman R, Welsh JS, Rosenthal SA; American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology; American College of Radiology. American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ASTRO) and American College of Radiology (ACR) practice guideline for the performance of stereotactic body radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010 Feb 1;76(2):326-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.09.042.
  4. Tsang MW. Stereotactic body radiotherapy: current strategies and future development. J Thorac Dis. 2016 Jul;8(Suppl 6):S517-27. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2016.03.14.
  5. Macià I Garau M. Radiobiology of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2017 Mar-Apr;22(2):86-95. doi: 10.1016/j.rpor.2017.02.010.
  6. Brown JM, Carlson DJ, Brenner DJ. The tumor radiobiology of SRS and SBRT: are more than the 5 Rs involved? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014 Feb 1;88(2):254-62. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.07.022.
  7. Gulstene S, Ruwanpura T, Palma D, Joseph N. Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy in the Treatment of Early-Stage Lung Cancer – A Done Deal? Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2022 Nov;34(11):733-740. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2022.08.027.
  8. Viani GA, Gouveia AG, Louie AV, Arcidiacono F, Simone CB 2nd, Tsakiridis T, Carolina Hamamura A, Anselmo P, Moraes FY. Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Radiother Oncol. 2024 Dec;201:110439. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110439.
  9. Bae SH, Chun SJ, Chung JH, Kim E, Kang JK, Jang WI, Moon JE, Roquette I, Mirabel X, Kimura T, Ueno M, Su TS, Tree AC, Guckenberger M, Lo SS, Scorsetti M, Slotman BJ, Kotecha R, Sahgal A, Louie AV, Kim MS. Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Meta-Analysis and International Stereotactic Radiosurgery Society Practice Guidelines. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2024 Feb 1;118(2):337-351. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.08.015
  10. Guckenberger M, Andratschke N, Belka C, Bellut D, Cuccia F, Dahele M, Guninski RS, Josipovic M, Mancosu P, Minniti G, Niyazi M, Ricardi U, Munck Af Rosenschold P, Sahgal A, Tsang Y, Verbakel W, Alongi F. ESTRO clinical practice guideline: Stereotactic body radiotherapy for spine metastases. Radiother Oncol. 2024 Jan;190:109966. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109966.
  11. Ma TM, Ladbury C, Tran M, Keiper TD, Andraos T, Gogineni E, Mohideen N, Siva S, Loblaw A, Tree AC, Cheung P, Kresl J, Collins S, Cao M, Kishan AU. Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy: A Radiosurgery Society Guide to the Treatment of Localized Prostate Cancer Illustrated by Challenging Cases. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2024 Mar-Apr;14(2):e117-e131. doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2023.08.011.
  12. Siva S, Louie AV, Kotecha R, Barber MN, Ali M, Zhang Z, Guckenberger M, Kim MS, Scorsetti M, Tree AC, Slotman BJ, Sahgal A, Lo SS. Stereotactic body radiotherapy for primary renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and practice guideline from the International Society of Stereotactic Radiosurgery (ISRS). Lancet Oncol. 2024 Jan;25(1):e18-e28. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(23)00513-2.
  13. Liu J, Sidiqi B, McComas K, Gogineni E, Andraos T, Crane CH, Chang DT, Goodman KA, Hall WA, Hoffe S, Mahadevan A, Narang AK, Lee P, Williams TM, Chuong MD. SBRT for Pancreatic Cancer: A Radiosurgery Society Case-Based Practical Guidelines to Challenging Cases. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2024 Nov-Dec;14(6):555-573. doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2024.06.004.
  14. Tree AC, Khoo VS, Eeles RA, Ahmed M, Dearnaley DP, Hawkins MA, Huddart RA, Nutting CM, Ostler PJ, van As NJ. Stereotactic body radiotherapy for oligometastases. Lancet Oncol. 2013 Jan;14(1):e28-37. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70510-7.
  15. Bilski M, Konat-Bąska K, Zerella MA, Corradini S, Hetnał M, Leonardi MC, Gruba M, Grzywacz A, Hatala P, Jereczek-Fossa BA, Fijuth J, Kuncman Ł. Advances in breast cancer treatment: a systematic review of preoperative stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for breast cancer. Radiat Oncol. 2024 Aug 2;19(1):103. doi: 10.1186/s13014-024-02497-4.
  16. Mohamad I, Karam I, El-Sehemy A, Abu-Gheida I, Al-Ibraheem A, Al-Assaf H, Aldehaim M, Alghamdi M, Alotain I, Ashour M, Bushehri A, ElHaddad M, Hosni A. The Evolving Role of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Head and Neck Cancer: Where Do We Stand? Cancers (Basel). 2023 Oct 16;15(20):5010. doi: 10.3390/cancers15205010.
  17. Ladbury C, Sueyoshi MH, Brovold NM, Kumar R, Andraos TY, Gogineni E, Kim M, Klopp A, Albuquerque K, Kunos C, Leung E, Mantz C, Biswas T, Beriwal S, Small W Jr, Erickson B, Gaffney D, Lo SS, Viswanathan AN. Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Gynecologic Malignancies: A Case-Based Radiosurgery Society Practice Review. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2024 May-Jun;14(3):252-266. doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2023.09.008.
  18. Nguyen TK, Ramadan S, Palma DA, Corkum MT, O’ Neil M, Celinski A, Fakir H, Warner A, Hallock A, Correa RJM, Qu XM, Lock M, Lang P, Velker V, Bauman GS. Ablative Radiation Therapy to Restrain Everything Safely Treatable (ARREST): A Phase 1 Study of Stereotactic Ablative Radiation Therapy for Polymetastatic Disease. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2024 Dec 1;120(5):1231-1238. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.06.033.
  19. Lubas MJ, Kumar SS. The Combined Use of SBRT and Immunotherapy-a Literature Review. Curr Oncol Rep. 2020 Sep 15;22(12):117. doi: 10.1007/s11912-020-00986-9.
  20. Loo BW, Jr., Chang JY, Dawson LA, et al. Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy: What’s in a name? Pract Radiat Oncol. 2011;1(1):38-39.