Hypofractionated Postoperative Radiation Therapy for Breast Cancer – Do We Need More Evidence or Adapted Reimbursement Policies?

Author(s) :

Monica-Emilia Chirilă1, Ivica Ratosa2,3, Gustavo Nader Marta4,5, Philip Poortmans6,7

1 Amethyst Radiotherapy Centre, Cluj-Napoca, Romania

2 Division of Radiation Oncology, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia

3 Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia

4 Department of Radiation Oncology – Hospital Sírio-Libanes, Sao Paulo, Brazil

5 Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group, Brazil

6 Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Netwerk, Wilrijk-Antwerp, Belgium

7 University of Antwerp, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Wilrijk-Antwerp, Belgium

Corresponding author: Monica-Emilia Chirilă, Email: monica.chirila@amethyst-radiotherapy.com


Published: Journal of Medical and Radiation Oncology 1 (2021) 83-98, , , - DOI: 10.53011/JMRO.2021.01.09

Open Access

Full text
×

Cite

March 22, 2021 0 Comments

Abstract

More than 10 years ago, two pivotal trials, the Ontario Clinical Oncology Group trial and START B trial, firmly established that hypofractionated radiation therapy (RT) of 40–42.5 Gy in 15–16 fractions over 3 weeks after breast conserving surgery or mastectomy results in similar rates of local recurrence and normal tissue effects. This led to a new standard for postoperative whole breast and chest wall RT. Further trials confirmed these findings and show that hypofractionated RT can also be applied for other indications, including regional nodal RT and for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). More recently, a so-called ultra-fractionation trial demonstrated that 26 Gy in 5 fractions over 1 week was non-inferior to 40 Gy, in 15 fractions in 3 weeks for local recurrence at 6 years and that late effects were similar between fractionation schedules being a treatment option for most patients with early breast cancer. Several countries and departments are now adopting hypofractionated schedules as a new standard for breast, chest wall or partial breast RT. In addition to the improvement in convenience and reduction in resources required, hypofractionated RT offers important benefits with respect to acute and late toxicity that can improve the quality of life of patients receiving breast RT.

Number of patients Inclusion Median follow-up – years (range) Type of surgery N (%) Chemotherapy

N (%)

Endocrine therapy

N (%)

Chemotherapy and endocrine therapy N (%) Boost

N (%)

Regional nodal irradiation

N (%)

Years Criteria Breast-conserving surgery Mastectomy
Moderate Hypofractionation
RMH/GOC611 1410 1986–1998 T1-3 N01 M0 9.7 (7.8–11.8) 1410 (100) 0 196 (14) 918 (65.1) 156 (11.1) 1051 (75) 290 (21)
START A 2236 1998–2002 T1–3 N0–1 M0 9.3 (8.0–10.0) 1900 (85) 336 (15) 793 (35) 1210 (54.1) 548 (24.5) 1152 (61) 318 (14)
START B 2215 1999–2001 T1–3 N0–1 M0 9.9 (7.5–10.1) 2038 (92) 177 (8) 491 (22) 1592 (71.9) 336 (15.2) 875 (43) 161 (7)
OCOG514 1234 1993–1996 T1–2 N0 M0 12.0* 1234 (100) 0 136 (11) 516 (41.8) NA 0 0
Beijing Trial 820 2008–2016 T3–T4 N2–3 M0 4.9 (3.7–6.8) 0 820 (100) 820 (100) 620 (75.6) NA 0 820 (100)
DBCG HYPO 1882 2009–2014 pTis–T2 N0–N1(mic) M0 7.3* 1882 (100) 0 668 (36) 560 (29.7)¥ NA 426 (23) 0
NCT01413269 729 2010–2015 T1–2 N0–2a M0 6.1* 729 (100) 0 477 (65) 238 (32.7) 358 (49.1) 732 (99.7) 28 (3.9)
BIG 3-07/TROG 07.01 1608 2007–2014 pTis N0 M0 6.6* 1608 (100) 0 0 225 (14) 0 803 (50) 0
Ultra-Hypofractionation
FAST (CRUKE/

04/015)

915 2004–2007 pT1–2 N0 M0 3.1 915 (100) 0 0 809 (88.4) 0 0 0
FAST-Forward 4096 2011–2014 pT1–3 N0–1 M0 6 3832 (93.6) 264 (6.4) 1447 (35.3) 3512 (96.2) NA 1011 (24.7) 0**
Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments