Author(s) :
Monica-Emilia Chirilă1, Ivica Ratosa2,3, Gustavo Nader Marta4,5, Philip Poortmans6,7
1 Amethyst Radiotherapy Centre, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
2 Division of Radiation Oncology, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
3 Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
4 Department of Radiation Oncology – Hospital Sírio-Libanes, Sao Paulo, Brazil
5 Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group, Brazil
6 Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Netwerk, Wilrijk-Antwerp, Belgium
7 University of Antwerp, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Wilrijk-Antwerp, Belgium
Corresponding author: Monica-Emilia Chirilă, Email: monica.chirila@amethyst-radiotherapy.com
Published: Journal of Medical and Radiation Oncology 1 (2021) 83-98, , , - DOI: 10.53011/JMRO.2021.01.09
Abstract
More than 10 years ago, two pivotal trials, the Ontario Clinical Oncology Group trial and START B trial, firmly established that hypofractionated radiation therapy (RT) of 40–42.5 Gy in 15–16 fractions over 3 weeks after breast conserving surgery or mastectomy results in similar rates of local recurrence and normal tissue effects. This led to a new standard for postoperative whole breast and chest wall RT. Further trials confirmed these findings and show that hypofractionated RT can also be applied for other indications, including regional nodal RT and for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). More recently, a so-called ultra-fractionation trial demonstrated that 26 Gy in 5 fractions over 1 week was non-inferior to 40 Gy, in 15 fractions in 3 weeks for local recurrence at 6 years and that late effects were similar between fractionation schedules being a treatment option for most patients with early breast cancer. Several countries and departments are now adopting hypofractionated schedules as a new standard for breast, chest wall or partial breast RT. In addition to the improvement in convenience and reduction in resources required, hypofractionated RT offers important benefits with respect to acute and late toxicity that can improve the quality of life of patients receiving breast RT.
Number of patients | Inclusion | Median follow-up – years (range) | Type of surgery N (%) | Chemotherapy
N (%) |
Endocrine therapy
N (%) |
Chemotherapy and endocrine therapy N (%) | Boost
N (%) |
Regional nodal irradiation
N (%) |
|||
Years | Criteria | Breast-conserving surgery | Mastectomy | ||||||||
Moderate Hypofractionation | |||||||||||
RMH/GOC611 | 1410 | 1986–1998 | T1-3 N01 M0 | 9.7 (7.8–11.8) | 1410 (100) | 0 | 196 (14) | 918 (65.1) | 156 (11.1) | 1051 (75) | 290 (21) |
START A | 2236 | 1998–2002 | T1–3 N0–1 M0 | 9.3 (8.0–10.0) | 1900 (85) | 336 (15) | 793 (35) | 1210 (54.1) | 548 (24.5) | 1152 (61) | 318 (14) |
START B | 2215 | 1999–2001 | T1–3 N0–1 M0 | 9.9 (7.5–10.1) | 2038 (92) | 177 (8) | 491 (22) | 1592 (71.9) | 336 (15.2) | 875 (43) | 161 (7) |
OCOG514 | 1234 | 1993–1996 | T1–2 N0 M0 | 12.0* | 1234 (100) | 0 | 136 (11) | 516 (41.8) | NA | 0 | 0 |
Beijing Trial | 820 | 2008–2016 | T3–T4 N2–3 M0 | 4.9 (3.7–6.8) | 0 | 820 (100) | 820 (100) | 620 (75.6) | NA | 0 | 820 (100) |
DBCG HYPO | 1882 | 2009–2014 | pTis–T2 N0–N1(mic) M0 | 7.3* | 1882 (100) | 0 | 668 (36) | 560 (29.7)¥ | NA | 426 (23) | 0 |
NCT01413269 | 729 | 2010–2015 | T1–2 N0–2a M0 | 6.1* | 729 (100) | 0 | 477 (65) | 238 (32.7) | 358 (49.1) | 732 (99.7) | 28 (3.9) |
BIG 3-07/TROG 07.01 | 1608 | 2007–2014 | pTis N0 M0 | 6.6* | 1608 (100) | 0 | 0 | 225 (14) | 0 | 803 (50) | 0 |
Ultra-Hypofractionation | |||||||||||
FAST (CRUKE/
04/015) |
915 | 2004–2007 | pT1–2 N0 M0 | 3.1 | 915 (100) | 0 | 0 | 809 (88.4) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
FAST-Forward | 4096 | 2011–2014 | pT1–3 N0–1 M0 | 6 | 3832 (93.6) | 264 (6.4) | 1447 (35.3) | 3512 (96.2) | NA | 1011 (24.7) | 0** |